Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 13:56:43 +0200 From: "Dimitar Peikov" <mitko@rila.bg> To: binup@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <200110291156.f9TBuhX81764@earth.rila.bg>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Sorry, but it'seems to me that someone must take control more hard on this project! I mean that someone must be responsible what is to be done there, not all subscribers to blame on maillist what is what to do and so on. As I saw this thread I got these conclusions : 1. Project must use libh for installation purposes. 1.a. To use libh there must be documentation available what libh is exactly 1.b. Other libraries, modules, packages or what the project would depends on 2. Server side part - currently we have only requirements 2.a. Specification 2.b. Implementation 3. Client side part - currently we have only requirements 3.a. Specification 3.b. Implementation Personally I'm for doing things not on the flow but in scenarios. This cleares the sense and comments are less. This also gives one view of the things. Because it's common case when 2 people speak about one think but have different viewpoints and therefore can't agree each other completely for a long time. PS: I havent in mind to argue someone particular, but I see that in this project there are only requests what should it be not something really done or proposal. -- Dimitar Peikov Programmer Analyst Globalization Group "We Build e-Business" RILA Solutions 27 Building, Acad.G.Bonchev Str. 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria phone: (+359 2) 9797320 phone: (+359 2) 9797300 fax: (+359 2) 9733355 http://www.rila.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-binup" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200110291156.f9TBuhX81764>