Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 10:26:01 +1030 From: Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> Cc: cjclark@alum.mit.edu, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Getting rid of /usr file system (was: Using a larger block size on large filesystems) Message-ID: <20011213102601.D76019@monorchid.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <200112122117.fBCLHhM38741@harmony.village.org> References: <20011211173028.H232@gohan.cjclark.org> <20011211234433.B697@clan.nothing-going-on.org> <20011212001610.9AEA739EA@overcee.netplex.com.au> <200112122117.fBCLHhM38741@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday, 12 December 2001 at 14:17:43 -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <20011211173028.H232@gohan.cjclark.org> "Crist J. Clark" writes: >> Nothing in man(1) actually breaks if you just make /usr read-only. You >> won't get cached pages, but in this day of overpowered CPUs, who >> cares? OTOH, in these days of super-cheap HHD, who needs markup pages >> except for the developers? > > Well, if installworld did a catman phase... I've seen a system which does this. I think it was Inactive. It's certainly a reasonable option, maybe even worth being the default. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011213102601.D76019>