Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 23:28:26 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org>, will@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: WANT_KDE_NDEBUG (Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/kdemultimedia2...) Message-ID: <20020107232825.U73815@squall.waterspout.com> In-Reply-To: <200201080421.g084Ldt25389@aldan.algebra.com> References: <20020107203826.T73815@squall.waterspout.com> <200201080421.g084Ldt25389@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 11:21:39PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Shouldn't this be a default for the port building too? Those building > from port, should not need to know a separate (and obscure) option... No. I assume people who build things from a port are possibly going to debug source code. People who want debug-free binaries should use the packages. But I won't force that on them. Not to mention that with the debugging code, they'll be able to send me more useful backtraces. It's not my fault that ports sucks for notifying users of special options in particular ports. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020107232825.U73815>