Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 20:36:34 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: mark@grondar.za, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: For all who miss it, PAM changes explanation reposted Message-ID: <20020119173633.GD11604@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <xzpadva8cy2.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <200201190901.g0J91H641020@freefall.freebsd.org> <xzp1ygm9vc8.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020119170316.GA11315@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpit9y8dcg.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020119172829.GB11604@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpadva8cy2.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 18:31:33 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > How much more specific can I get? Your explanation only covers part > of the changes, and does not explain why the current behaviour is I already post additional one about pam_unix changes, VERY recently. > incorrect (beyond enumerating some of the cases in which it is Old behaviour is incorrect because provides UNCONDITIONAL fallback from pam_opie failure to pam_unix, next in the chain. This fallback must be CONDITIONAL according to OPIE way of things. Conditions include remote host checking and user home directory checking. > *all* the changes you committed (which I'm still waiting for you to > back out, BTW.) See my another already posted message about this. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020119173633.GD11604>