Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:55:53 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [PATCH] msdosfs: differrent masks for directories and other files Message-ID: <20020122095553.A83831@svzserv.kemerovo.su> In-Reply-To: <200201211727.g0LHRBG03770@apollo.backplane.com>; from dillon@apollo.backplane.com on Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 09:27:11AM -0800 References: <20020120102521.A450@grosbein.pp.ru> <200201210638.g0L6cFO01596@apollo.backplane.com> <3C4BB9E5.E7E63C29@www.kuzbass.ru> <200201211727.g0LHRBG03770@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 09:27:11AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: > :> Why not simply mount the filesystem with the 'noexec' flag? > :This does not turn 'executable' bit off from files > :and therefore does not prevent midc from 'executing' archives > :instead of 'entering into' them. > Ah. It kinda sounds like midc itself should be hacked as an 'official' > solution rather then msdosfs, but I think you've done an excellent job > to deal with your own users. Does it mean this path will not be commited even after code freeze? Eugene Grosbein To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020122095553.A83831>