Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 23:56:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "Michael C. Wu" <keichii@iteration.net>, obrien@FreeBSD.org, arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: syscall changes to deal with 32->64 changes. Message-ID: <200205100656.g4A6uZgF031059@apollo.backplane.com> References: <XFMail.20020510011352.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:> :> Vendor imported code (e.g. KAME(sigh..), USB, possibly 1394, :> cardbus, possibly some userland important tools and libraries) :> would have little or no diffs from the original vendor's code.. : :Erm, all the changes so far aren't in API's, but rather changing the size :of types like time_t. The same KAME code would compile fine. : :-- : :John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ Huh? Changing the size of time_t sure sounds like an API change to me! <GRIN>. Which was my original point... though I was considering those ports which might not be 64-bit-time_t friendly (probably hundreds). -Matt Matthew Dillon <dillon@backplane.com> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200205100656.g4A6uZgF031059>