Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 18:15:17 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: imp@village.org, bts@babbleon.org, kris@obsecurity.org, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, portmgr@FreeBSD.ORG, core@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: My position on commiters guide 10.4.4 Message-ID: <20020522141514.GA98951@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20020522134124.GA98620@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20020522054234.GB93907@nagual.pp.ru> <200205221304.g4MD3ujl001185@Magelan.Leidinger.net> <20020522134124.GA98620@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 17:41:25 +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > he (porter) must do part of security officer work. Moreover, not each porter have needed qualification for that work. I mean, this is responsibility question. I have needed qualification and for that reason I see how big amount of work needs to be done in that way, this is not simple log message "something changed", there detailed analyze of program code flow needed. And I can't take that responsibility due to lack of resources and interest. For example, binary daemon changed. I can't say that it is secure as before without full testing cycle. And I don't want to do that cycle. And I can't produce simple log message saing "something change there and there, all is Ok". Because I know that something can be fishy here. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020522141514.GA98951>