Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 11:14:40 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org> To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Cc: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org>, portmgr@FreeBSD.ORG, re@FreeBSD.ORG, alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Alpha package building status Message-ID: <20020522161440.GO53809@squall.waterspout.com> In-Reply-To: <15595.49495.889584.825785@moe.cs.duke.edu> References: <1F095B0753FCD411857700010333058A04EEC8BF@waexch1.qgraph.com> <15595.40622.377080.973573@moe.cs.duke.edu> <20020522143405.GN53809@squall.waterspout.com> <15595.49495.889584.825785@moe.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 12:03:35PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > OK. Here it is. > > On 4.x only, there are only inline byte swap routines for x86. > On alpha, they're called htons and htonl. > > On 5.x, this is standardized across all platforms, so this fix is only > for < 5.0 Can you embed this fact in the patch itself so I don't have to hack the Makefile only to apply the patch when OSVERSION < 500000? If you do that you can commit just the patch itself. (Unless I am misunderstanding and this patch would not cause problems on 5.0?) Thanks, -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020522161440.GO53809>