Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 10:25:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Frank Mayhar <frank@exit.com> To: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> Cc: Dave Uhring <duhring@charter.net>, Jason Porter <leporter@xmission.com>, freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Better to make XFree86-4 when XFree86-3 isn't running? Message-ID: <200207071725.g67HPBKA092095@realtime.exit.com> In-Reply-To: <20020707210226.P98680-100000@woozle.rinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > Hmm... Reading through, I did not find any very specific "it does not > work" cases. However, I see that many people found ATI cards as a PITA. > > ... the problem is that I have no spare hardware to test it thoroughly, > and my workstation works also as central monitoring point for our network > ;-) > > Maybe I'll try "ati*.o from 4.1" way... > > Stangely enough, there is no info about ATI<->XFree86 4.2 at > http://www.xfree86.org/4.2.0/Status6.html I'm using a Radeon 8500 128MB card. I had problems with 4.2.0 (it worked but a few things were a tad flaky, especially Xvideo), but I've been updating from the XFree86 CVS tree and it is working better and better. Just one data point. -- Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/ Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200207071725.g67HPBKA092095>