Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Jul 2002 20:13:50 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Chris BeHanna <behanna@zbzoom.net>
To:        FreeBSD-Stable <stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: GCC/header-related regressions on -STABLE
Message-ID:  <20020712201311.T39095-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0207111354090.22305-100000@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

> standards/40084 and standards/40402 constitute significant regressions
> on -STABLE, which definitely should be fixed for 4.6.1-RELEASE.
>
> Having three-line C++ programs like the following
>   #include <iostream>
>   #include <string>
>   int main() { }
> issue three(!) warnings with g++ -pedantic is A Very Bad Thing[TM],
> especially on -STABLE.

    Should it not at least gripe that there's no return statement in a
non-void function?

-- 
Chris BeHanna                      http://www.pennasoft.com
Principal Consultant
PennaSoft Corporation
chris@pennasoft.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020712201311.T39095-100000>