Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 14:16:00 -0500 (EST) From: Eric Dedrick <dedrick@dsl-146-127.resnet.purdue.edu> To: Jud <jud@myrealbox.com> Cc: <dnelson@allantgroup.com>, <adam@vectors.cx>, <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: linux compatability broken Message-ID: <20020725141428.P304-100000@dsl-146-127.resnet.purdue.edu> In-Reply-To: <1027622522.65b8affcjud@myrealbox.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Just to clarify, I mean that using portupgrade will > (hopefully, and in my experience, almost always) take > care of your dependencies during the upgrade process, > thus saving you from the IMO less preferable > alternative of running more than one version of a > port. > > Have you tried portupgrade with linux_base (after a > backup of the old linux_base port skeleton and > installation of the new one) to see whether Maple > is happy? Yup. portupgrading eliminates ld-linux.so.1, required by maple. Thanks for the suggestion, though. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020725141428.P304-100000>