Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 08:09:54 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet in_rmx.c ip_input.c ip_var.h Message-ID: <20020809080953.B62786@iguana.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <200208091449.g79EnNRh005472@freefall.freebsd.org>; from ru@FreeBSD.org on Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 07:49:23AM -0700 References: <200208091449.g79EnNRh005472@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 07:49:23AM -0700, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > ru 2002/08/09 07:49:23 PDT > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) > sys/netinet in_rmx.c ip_input.c ip_var.h > Log: > MFC: in_rmx.c,v 1.39, ip_input.c,v 1.165, and ip_var.h,v 1.54: > > Invalidate cached forwarding route (ipforward_rt) whenever a new > route is added to the routing table, otherwise we may end up using > the wrong route when forwarding. this reminds me... what do we gain from having one route cached ? Most if not all boxes talk to multiple destinations anyways, so we should rather leverage on the cache in ip_flow.c than use this trick. cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020809080953.B62786>