Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:45:16 -0700 (MST)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        nate@root.org
Cc:        kientzle@acm.org, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Shrinking /(s)bin: A Proposal
Message-ID:  <20021113.234516.77421925.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0211131723350.41379-100000@root.org>
References:  <3DD03D9A.6090805@acm.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0211131723350.41379-100000@root.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0211131723350.41379-100000@root.org>
            Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> writes:
: On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Tim Kientzle wrote:
: > The possibility of dynamically linking /(s)bin seems
: > to recur pretty regularly.  As libc continues to grow,
: > this idea seems worth revisiting.  However, I've come up
: > with an alternative that might be worth considering.
: 
: I'm open to patches for building /[s]bin as dynamic.  If you have time and
: can coordinate with lukem@netbsd.org to build the patch, I would
: appreciate it.

% make NOSHARED=NO buildworld

No patches necessary.  We do this all the time at work, and it works
fabulously.  I do this for disk based systems that have / and /usr on
the same file system too.

warner

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021113.234516.77421925.imp>