Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 13:28:59 -0200 From: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@FreeBSD.org> To: Nik Clayton <nik@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: <application>majordomo</application> ? Message-ID: <20021207152921.75379.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> In-Reply-To: <20021207145633.GN96173@clan.nothing-going-on.org> References: <20011029233458.A26260@exxodus.fedaykin.here> <20021207145633.GN96173@clan.nothing-going-on.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 02:56:11PM +0000, Nik Clayton wrote: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 11:34:58PM -0200, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote: > > Just a doubt, should majordomo be surrounded by > > application tags? What about other programs which are not system > > commands? > > If not, what's the exactly use of the application tag. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/fdp-primer/x1384.html#AEN1785 > > See section 4.2.5.4 Thanks :) One last thing, this is something I discussed with keramida regarding commands with options. FPD lists <command>sendmail -bp</command> but wouldn't it be even cleaner to use <command>sendmail <option>-bp</option></command> ? I understand that command might be refering to the command to be used by the user. Therefore, -bp is part of the command. However, isn't -bp a subpart of command? An "obligatory" option of the command? I hope this is not too much nit picking? Regards, -- Mario S F Ferreira - DF - Brazil - "I guess this is a signature." Computer Science Undergraduate | FreeBSD Committer | CS Developer flames to beloved devnull@someotherworldbeloworabove.org feature, n: a documented bug | bug, n: an undocumented feature To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021207152921.75379.qmail>