Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 18:08:04 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Cc: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bystander shot by a spam filter Message-ID: <20030105073804.GA72674@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20030104202908.03c3b100@localhost> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030104201251.029387d0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030104112015.026a5530@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030104201251.029387d0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030104202908.03c3b100@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday, 4 January 2003 at 20:31:52 -0700, Brett Glass wrote: > At 08:22 PM 1/4/2003, Rahul Siddharthan wrote: > >> So you disassembled and examined it? Or did you benchmark it? > > Actually, both. In heavy matrix math (with lots of determinants, > inversions, etc.), Intel beats GCC by a mile. Ditto on "bit-banging" > (bit manipulation, especially for graphics). Didn't disassemble the > code, though; just asked the compilers to output assembler. The > GCC output was so naive it made me wince. I'd be interested to see some examples. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030105073804.GA72674>