Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 01:04:17 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: David Yeske <dyeske@yahoo.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG, Mario <lioux@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: USE_SDL Message-ID: <20030217090417.GA71101@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20030217084903.80946.qmail@web13508.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20030217080104.GB70689@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030217084903.80946.qmail@web13508.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 12:49:03AM -0800, David Yeske wrote:
> I'm trying to follow the methods applied to GTK_CONFIG and
> GLIB_CONFIG, unless there is a better way to do this. Most of the
> time the information provided by ${SDL_CONFIG} --libs does not need
> to be redefined because most ports will or should use ${SDL_CONFIG}
> --libs to determine those values. Sometimes -lSDL will be hardcoded
> but that is not common There is no GTK_LIBS or GLIB_LIBS defined,
> and developers are responsible for knowing when to use
> `${GTK/GLIB_CONFIG} --libs`. I think it would be appropriate to not
> define SDL_LIBS via USE_SDL.
I don't see GTK_CONFIG or GLIB_CONFIG being used in this manner in bsd.*.mk.
Kris
--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE+UKWRWry0BWjoQKURAlBeAKD9chZo/wNmEG/P2xLdhdxBa06BDwCgss0N
5AhdeIuIfyy8SA+edHCu+PQ=
=e9rr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk--
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030217090417.GA71101>