Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:38:03 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> To: ak03@gte.com Cc: hwh@gddsn.org.cn, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Native jdk1.4.1 JNI problem with Eclipse IDE Message-ID: <20030307093803.GH93105@starjuice.net> In-Reply-To: <20030306203111.0781d693.kabaev@bellatlantic.net> References: <20030306090708.GY60356@starjuice.net> <3E676C23.60304@gddsn.org.cn> <20030306180305.GB86455@starjuice.net> <20030306203111.0781d693.kabaev@bellatlantic.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On (2003/03/06 20:31), Alexander Kabaev wrote: > I just compiled Eclipse 2.1RC1 with GTK on -STABLE and it appears to > work just fine. With jdk1.41p3 of course :). > > The port I used in nowhere near of production quality though... So there are 3 eclipse-2.1-rc1 ports floating around, two of which work but aren't published and one of which doesn't work and is published. What would be cool is if one of the unpublished ones was made available, so that I could try to figure out what JNI funkiness exists in the broken one that's handled better in a working one. The unpublished -gtk variant would be ideal, since the broken one is a -gtk variant. One of the cool things about the ports tree is that it acts as a great reference, even if its contents aren't perfect *hint*. It can also prevent duplication of effort *hint* *hint*. :-) To that end, I think I'll commit James' version to the ports tree when the freeze is over, unless someone else decides to commit their as-yet unpublished version. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030307093803.GH93105>