Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 19:41:40 -0400 From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@attbi.com> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New libpthread patch available. Message-ID: <20030411234140.GA51044@attbi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10304111921400.12814-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10304111302390.19238-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10304111921400.12814-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 07:29:54PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > libkse libc_r > ACE 5.3.1 Test Pass? Pass? > ------------------------------------------------ > Cached_Conn_Test No No > Conn_Test No Yes > MT_Reactor_Timer_Test No Yes > Malloc_Test No No > Proactor_Test No No > Proactor_Timer_Test No No > Process_Manager_Test No Yes > Process_Strategy_Test No Yes > Sigset_Ops_Test No No > Thread_Pool_Test No Yes > Hi, Would you be interested in using the ACE autobuild perl scripts to run the ACE tests? The results of the tests are formatted in a nice HTML format which you can push to a web page. For example, the build output of my build of ACE+TAO is published here: http://www.dist-systems.bbn.com/projects/AIRES/UAV/scoreboard/main/ If I see your build output, I may be able to help isoloate some problems. The Proactor stuff depends on POSIX AIO + threads, so looking too closely at that for KSE may be a waste of time, unless you want to look at AIO also. Sigset depends on proper signals support. The Thread tests are worth paying attention to. The other thing to keep in mind is that some of the ACE tests are very convoluted and busted in subtle ways. If you are interested using the autobuild scripts to publish your ACE build output, I can help you with that off the list. -- Craig Rodrigues http://home.attbi.com/~rodrigc rodrigc@attbi.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030411234140.GA51044>