Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 3 May 2003 15:09:19 -0700
From:      "Cliff L. Biffle" <cbiffle@safety.net>
To:        Duraid Madina <duraid@octopus.com.au>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Floppy Support
Message-ID:  <200305031509.19473.cbiffle@safety.net>
In-Reply-To: <3EB3C118.6020203@octopus.com.au>
References:  <3EB3C118.6020203@octopus.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 03 May 2003 06:16 am, Duraid Madina wrote:
> Can anyone give a *good* reason why floppies should still be supported
> from this point onwards?

1. El Torito.  Last I checked, under emulation, 2.88MB was the largest boot 
image available, so fitting the bootloader/kernel/etc. onto two floppies is 
still quite significant.  I've only run across one machine that could 
competently handle non-emulated CD booting.
2. Servers without CDROM drives.  As another poster mentioned, 1U rack or 
clustering servers frequently don't have CDROMs.  I know mine don't.

I'm still confused as to why the $CVS$ tags are going into the kernel on the 
floppies, but that strikes me as minor. :-)

-Cliff L. Biffle



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200305031509.19473.cbiffle>