Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 11:16:21 +0200 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> To: current@freebsd.org Cc: grog@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vinum bug? (Re: Yet another crash in FreeBSD 5.1) Message-ID: <20030802091620.GB6331@cicely12.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <20030802090052.GA25338@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <1079.192.168.0.3.1059811884.squirrel@webmail.aminor.no> <20030802090052.GA25338@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 02:00:52AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 10:11:24AM +0200, Eivind Olsen wrote: > > > db> trace > > g_dev_strategy(c2156024,c2153800,0,cfb528d0,c2099eca) at g_dev_strategy+0x29 > > launch_requests(c299bf00,0,10000,ffffffff,47) at launch_requests+0x448 > > vinumstart(c5ada2d0,0,c22ab000,cfb5294c,c02e5bc6) at vinumstart+0x2b2 > > vinumstrategy(c5ada2d0,0,c09719b0,40,0) at vinumstrategy+0xa6 > > Looks like a problem in vinum. The other backtrace was the same, right? Please take a look at an older thread named (IIRC) vinum or geom bug? Greg asked for special debug output, but it never happened again for me. A real murphy bug - it happend on three machines once a day and after Gregs response nothing happened over weeks. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso@bwct.de info@bwct.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030802091620.GB6331>