Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 09:35:28 +0930 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: Eivind Olsen <eivind@aminor.no>, ticso@cicely.de Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Yet another crash in FreeBSD 5.1 Message-ID: <20030803000528.GF95375@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <2712203.1059843659@[192.168.0.2]> <20030802091620.GB6331@cicely12.cicely.de> <1079.192.168.0.3.1059811884.squirrel@webmail.aminor.no> References: <1079.192.168.0.3.1059811884.squirrel@webmail.aminor.no> <20030802090052.GA25338@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030802091620.GB6331@cicely12.cicely.de> <2712203.1059843659@[192.168.0.2]> <1079.192.168.0.3.1059811884.squirrel@webmail.aminor.no> <20030802090052.GA25338@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030802091620.GB6331@cicely12.cicely.de> <1079.192.168.0.3.1059811884.squirrel@webmail.aminor.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--xaMk4Io5JJdpkLEb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday, 2 August 2003 at 17:00:59 +0200, Eivind Olsen wrote: > --On 2. august 2003 11:16 +0200 Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> > wrote: >>> Looks like a problem in vinum. The other backtrace was the same, right? >> Please take a look at an older thread named (IIRC) vinum or geom bug? >> Greg asked for special debug output, but it never happened again for me. >> A real murphy bug - it happend on three machines once a day and after >> Gregs response nothing happened over weeks. > > Are you thinking of the thread "vinum and/or geom panic on alpha" from 10th > of June? I forgot to mention this but my system is i386 uniprocessor > (Pentium2 at 450MHz). > > In case it's relevant, yes I do run vinum: Yes, of course you do. That's what the stack trace says, and that's why people mentioned Vinum in the first place: On Saturday, 2 August 2003 at 10:11:24 +0200, Eivind Olsen wrote: > Here's some output from DDB: > > db> trace > g_dev_strategy(c2156024,c2153800,0,cfb528d0,c2099eca) at g_dev_strategy+0x29 > launch_requests(c299bf00,0,10000,ffffffff,47) at launch_requests+0x448 > vinumstart(c5ada2d0,0,c22ab000,cfb5294c,c02e5bc6) at vinumstart+0x2b2 > vinumstrategy(c5ada2d0,0,c09719b0,40,0) at vinumstrategy+0xa6 On Saturday, 2 August 2003 at 11:16:21 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 02:00:52AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 10:11:24AM +0200, Eivind Olsen wrote: >> >>> db> trace >>> g_dev_strategy(c2156024,c2153800,0,cfb528d0,c2099eca) at g_dev_strategy+0x29 >>> launch_requests(c299bf00,0,10000,ffffffff,47) at launch_requests+0x448 >>> vinumstart(c5ada2d0,0,c22ab000,cfb5294c,c02e5bc6) at vinumstart+0x2b2 >>> vinumstrategy(c5ada2d0,0,c09719b0,40,0) at vinumstrategy+0xa6 >> >> Looks like a problem in vinum. The other backtrace was the same, right? > > Please take a look at an older thread named (IIRC) vinum or geom bug? > Greg asked for special debug output, but it never happened again for me. > A real murphy bug - it happend on three machines once a day and after > Gregs response nothing happened over weeks. This is the real issue. Until you supply the information I ask for in the man page or at http://www.vinumvm.org/vinum/how-to-debug.html, only Terry can help you. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers --xaMk4Io5JJdpkLEb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/LFHIIubykFB6QiMRAvcOAJ9TF6v+UX17h69Eg3qMqe6eSlv3lwCdEIgG zwZ3ImG90Funa/bGJ4YbSgg= =oI6m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xaMk4Io5JJdpkLEb--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030803000528.GF95375>