Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 21:59:22 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [releng_4 tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha Message-ID: <20030817045922.GA48181@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20030817010026.95964C4@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> References: <tenebrae_BSD@niceboots.com> <20030816162103.Y1159@steeltoe.niceboots.com> <20030817010026.95964C4@CRWdog.demon.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 06:00:26PM -0700, Andy Sparrow wrote: > The same thing started in -PORTS quite some time ago, where I find=20 > personally find that it generates more cr@p than the real traffic at=20 > times. You're entitled to your opinion, but since you've never had to deal with the flood of support requests when INDEX builds were broken by careless committers before I started the automated tinderbox, I'd suggest you try to consider it from point of view of those of us who are actually involved in the support of the OS. Kris --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/PwuqWry0BWjoQKURAquSAKDrN5cwLDG0d2NVCF5I97zywn9mbQCfUgJ4 wYZfcU3gw9SV8yZ/xgN3X40= =3dpE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030817045922.GA48181>