Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 22:10:49 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Subject: Re: /lib symlinks problem? Message-ID: <20030901051049.GB91933@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20030831145224.GC28845@sunbay.com> References: <200308291454.h7TEsb913915@accms33.physik.rwth-aachen.de> <20030829172348.1aa0b5d4.Alexander@Leidinger.net> <20030829161907.GA89129@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20030830135427.0cea7fdb.Alexander@Leidinger.net> <20030830185653.GA10674@sunbay.com> <20030831140742.3bd1b597.Alexander@Leidinger.net> <20030831145224.GC28845@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 05:52:24PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > I might be missing an obvious, but I just don't see a reason
> > > why we should use relative linking here: we should just link
> > > to where we really install. With the attached patch, I get:
...
> +.if ${LIBDIR} != ${SHLIBDIR}
> + ln -fs ${SHLIBDIR}/${SHLIB_NAME} ${DESTDIR}${LIBDIR}/${SHLIB_LINK}
Why are we making *any* symlinks here??
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030901051049.GB91933>