Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 22:36:39 +0100 (CET) From: Michael Reifenberger <root@reifenberger.com> To: "C. Kukulies" <kuku@www.kukulies.org> Cc: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how dangerous would it be to switch to 5.1-current? Message-ID: <20031118223226.T17712@nihil.reifenberger.com> In-Reply-To: <200311181733.hAIHXN4X096374@www.kukulies.org> References: <200311181733.hAIHXN4X096374@www.kukulies.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, C. Kukulies wrote:
> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 18:33:23 +0100 (CET)
> From: C. Kukulies <kuku@www.kukulies.org>
> To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org
> Subject: how dangerous would it be to switch to 5.1-current?
>
> With a gateway machine that runs 4.8 stable I'm considering to
> switch to 5.1-current (cvsup) at the danger of being off-net
> after the upgrade. Should I?
>
Too dangerous.
If you ask this question ('cause you havn't tried), you shouldn't upgrade.
At least not to -current. Maybe RELENG_4.
Bye!
----
Michael Reifenberger
^.*Plaut.*$, IT, R/3 Basis, GPS
FreeBSD is BSD, UNIX(tm) is a BSD-like OS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031118223226.T17712>