Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:01:27 -0800 From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> To: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Yu-Shun Wang <yushunwa@ISI.EDU> Subject: Re: which flash? (plugins, wrappers) Message-ID: <20031120190127.20ED15D07@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: Message from Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> <200311201822.hAKIMg8X016693@sakura.ninth-nine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 03:22:42 +0900 (JST) > From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> > Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org > > On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:07:54 -0800 > Yu-Shun Wang <yushunwa@ISI.EDU> wrote: > > > Maybe, flashpluginwrapper-0.20021113 and linux-flashplugin-5.0r51. > > > Or new linuxpluginwrapper-20031120(not committed) and > > > linux-flashplugin6-6.0r79. > > Two short questions: > > - Should I uninstall one before install another? > > Yes. Because of CONFLICTS these ports on runtime. > > > - Is it the intention to have a generic linux plugin wrapper (hence > > the name)? Or I'd suggest following the naming convention of > > flashpluginwrapperX (X=6 in this case) rather than having yet > > another name which is IMHO not very intuitive for someone > > not following the list. :-) > > Linux Plugin Wrapper supports Flash6 and Acrobat5. > In theory, it has a availability which is support > other plugins for linux. After all of the work to make this happen and how big an improvement it makes, I hate to ask for more, but is there any hope to support the RealPlayer plug-in? -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031120190127.20ED15D07>