Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:06:52 +0100 (CET) From: Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de> To: Pete Fritchman <petef@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: help from a ports committer needed Message-ID: <20040105150058.S13398@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> In-Reply-To: <20040102224633.E97CC178EC@sirius.firepipe.net> References: <20040102224633.E97CC178EC@sirius.firepipe.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, Pete Fritchman wrote: PF>* Fri, 02 Jan 2004 16:33:10 +0100 - Harti Brandt: PF>| I have attached what, I think, constitutes a minimal port infrastructure. PF>| Unfortunately the port makefile fails, while the package builds just fine PF>| standalone (just do a configure; make). This seems due to the arguments PF>| which are passed to the configure script. Perhaps something is missing in PF>| the Makefile. PF> PF>Ok. You'll need a distinfo, too, which you can generate with "make makesum". PF> PF>I think these modifications would be good (helps the port pass portlint PF>and configure), PF> PF>http://people.freebsd.org/~petef/atmsupport.diff PF> PF>However, I still can't compile this on a 4.x machine: PF> PF>cc1: Invalid option `-Wsystem-headers' PF>cc1: unknown C standard `c99' PF>ats_exp.c:41: syntax error before `expr' PF>cc1: warnings being treated as errors PF>[...] (full log on request) Well, it cannot compile on 4.x because the ATM stuff it tests is only in Current. Is there a way to stop this from beeing compiled on 4.x? Is sysutils the correct category for this? There seems to be no category for tests. How do I add this port (when the freeze lifts)? Thanks for your help, harti -- harti brandt, http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de, harti@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040105150058.S13398>