Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 09:46:51 +0100 From: "Lars =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6ller?=" <Lars@koellers.net> To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Lars =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6ller?= <lars@koellers.net> Subject: Re: Please reserve UID/GID for bacula port Message-ID: <200401070846.i078kppZ001556@odie.koellers.net> In-Reply-To: Message from Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> <20040106101604.N88773@znfgre.qbhto.arg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In reply to Doug Barton who wrote: >On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Lars K=F6ller wrote: > >> 910 is chosen cause bacula uses the TCP ports 9101, 9102 and 9103 >> (IANA registered). Perhaps they could be included into /etc/system: > >Since every line we add to /etc/services adds expense to the various >getportby*() functions, we only add new lines when it can be >demonstrated that it would benefit a large percentage of our userbase. >How many people do you think use this bacula port? Sorry, but I can't give you a number. But I think there is no "large percentage of our userbase" using it. Even some active FreeBSD = user are on the bacula mailing list. It's nice to have the ports in /etc/services when using tolls like = lsof. = Thanks = Lars -- = Lars K=F6ller E-Mail: lars@koellers.net (LKoeller@FreeBSD.ORG) -------- FreeBSD, was sonst? ---- http://www.de.freebsd.org --------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200401070846.i078kppZ001556>