Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 Jan 2004 05:50:49 -0800
From:      John Kennedy <jk@jk.homeunix.net>
To:        Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ?
Message-ID:  <20040115135049.GA27992@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net>
In-Reply-To: <xzpisjdmwld.fsf@dwp.des.no>
References:  <E1AgoC5-000Jwa-O6@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk> <20040114172740.GA24901@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> <xzpisjdmwld.fsf@dwp.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 09:42:38AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> there is no "more or less".  there is only one ports tree, and a
> freshly updated ports tree on a 4.9 box is exactly the same as a
> freshly updated ports tree on a 5.2 box.

  Read the users email.  They're using specific tags, not "." so there are
(or may be) some differences as time elapses.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040115135049.GA27992>