Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 4 Feb 2004 08:43:58 +0300
From:      Wartan Hachaturow <wart@tepkom.ru>
To:        David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: SCCS and batch environment utiltites.
Message-ID:  <20040204054358.GA21384@mojo.tepkom.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20040204033832.GA3952@VARK.homeunix.com>
References:  <20040203213613.GA28189@mojo.tepkom.ru> <20040204033832.GA3952@VARK.homeunix.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 07:38:32PM -0800, David Schultz wrote:

> That said, I don't see any reason SCCS
> has to be in the base system unless FreeBSD is actively seeking POSIX
> certification.

Exactly that was a question I tried to rise -- are we actively seeking
POSIX certification, or just trying to be "mostly compatible"?
Considering also the fact that FreeBSD is, perhaps, the closest
to that state between other free un*xes.

-- 
Regards, Wartan.
"Be different: conform."



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040204054358.GA21384>