Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:46:26 -0700 (MST) From: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should ps -p list threads? Message-ID: <20040212124357.B21291@pooker.samsco.home> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10402121418450.5277-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10402121418450.5277-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > The origianlpatch had _H show threads and normal ps did not.. > > I don't know why this is as it is... > > Because it didn't take into account other 'ps' options. Enabling > or disabling thread info should be an option for all KERN_PROC_foo, > not a separate option. If I were to change it, I would add > > #define KERN_PROC_THREADS 0x10000 > > to <sys/sysctl.h>. Then allow: > > mib[0] = CTL_KERN; > mib[1] = KERN_PROC; > mib[2] = KERN_PROC_UID | KERN_PROC_THREADS; > mib[3] = pid; > > ... > Yeah, it's probably cleaner that way. Still, you'll have to deal with KERN_PROC_PROC vs. KERN_PROC_ALL. Maybe just remove both and have KERN_PROC_THREAD be a modifier for KERN_PROC_PID. Are you willing to do the kernel work for this too? Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040212124357.B21291>