Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 02:12:19 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What to do about nologin(8)? Message-ID: <20040223231219.GA83154@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.1.20040223171828.03de8b30@imap.sfu.ca> References: <6.0.1.1.1.20040223171828.03de8b30@imap.sfu.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 05:45:07PM +0000, Colin Percival wrote: > For security reasons, nologin(8) must be statically linked; What that mystical reasons are, exactly? I see no one while it is not have s-bit set. At least -current /sbin is dynamically linked, so nologin must too. -- Andrey Chernov | http://ache.pp.ru/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040223231219.GA83154>