Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 13:52:16 -0800 From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> To: "Shaun T. Erickson" <ste@ste-land.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsdb issues Message-ID: <200403061352.16409.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <404A4613.2000805@ste-land.com> References: <404A3BDD.9050507@ste-land.com> <200403061330.36902.kstewart@owt.com> <404A4613.2000805@ste-land.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 06 March 2004 01:43 pm, Shaun T. Erickson wrote: > Kent Stewart wrote: > > There was a problem like this a couple of days ago but I haven't > > seen any problem generating INDEX today. I would re-cvsup and see > > if it goes away. > > I have been diligently keeping my system cvsup'd every day. It dawned > on me that I haven't been running portsdb -Uu after every cvsup > though, so I ran it, and that's what I got. > > So what do I do now? > Did you recvsup and then run portsdb -uU? My 5-current system has been generating INDEX for more than 5 minutes. When all of these messages show up, they usually start appearing by now. A complete make index takes about 20 minutes on opal. Portsdb -U uses make index. What does a uname -a produce? There was a thing with jails and I don't have a jail setup on any of my machines. What I get with a recent cvsup of ports-all is Generating INDEX-5 - please wait.. Done. [Updating the portsdb <format:bdb1_btree> in /usr/ports ... - 10497 port entries found .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000.........6000.........7000.........8000.........9000.........10000.... ..... done] Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200403061352.16409.kstewart>