Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:12:00 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Query on status of cross-builds Message-ID: <20040702201200.GA3485@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20040702184443.GB4193@ip.net.ua> References: <20040630164047.GC86725@ip.net.ua> <20040702162001.GD78489@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040702184443.GB4193@ip.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 09:44:43PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 09:20:01AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > > - ia64: internal errors in ld(1) > > > > Way, way at the bottom of my task list. > > Others are certainly free to look into this. > > > Marcel sent you a patch that fixes BFD configuration for ia64 > on 32-bit machines. > > > > - sparc64: generates bad assembler in gnu/usr.bin/tar > > > > See ia64 responce above. > > > sparc64 will probably need the same patch. No. It's a compiler bug on sparc64. I think the old binutils just didn't complain about the invalid instruction. I compared the output of the native cc and the cross cc and they are different. Not much, but fataly so. It'll be interesting to see if gcc 3.4 fixes this... -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040702201200.GA3485>