Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:42:51 +0000 From: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@FreeBSD.org> To: David Rhodus <sdrhodus@gmail.com> Cc: Roman Kurakin <rik@cronyx.ru> Subject: Re: Public Access to Perforce? Message-ID: <20040818144251.GA22971@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Rhodus wrote: >On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 17:57:19 +0400, Roman Kurakin <rik@cronyx.ru> wrote: >> I fully agree with you. But this not affect "open source"ness. >> I'd rather call it open development. >> >> rik > >Yes, it does when the public doesn't have direct access to the >development work going on. Thats what started this thread in the >first place. > >-- > -David > Steven David Rhodus When are you and some of your DragonFly minions going to stop spreading this garbage? If you want to talk about open-source, why don't you divert the attention to the frankly cowardly behavior going on pertaining to parts of the DragonFly source tree instead? Whereas DragonFly has appropriated a significant amount of FreeBSD code, only to ammend the lisencing to its own network code to include the advertising clause (removed officially from the BSDL a while ago now), and for what? Only to make it difficult for FreeBSD to take some of the code back. So if you want to talk about 'shitty open-source practises,' I'd argue that yours are much more significant than ours. -Bosko
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040818144251.GA22971>