Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 8 Sep 2004 12:50:25 GMT
From:      Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
To:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: kern/71474: route lookup does not skip interfaces marked down
Message-ID:  <200409081250.i88CoPBQ086191@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR kern/71474; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
To: Thomas Quinot <thomas@freebsd.org>
Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/71474: route lookup does not skip interfaces marked down
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 15:49:26 +0300

 On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 02:26:29PM +0200, Thomas Quinot wrote:
 > * Ruslan Ermilov, 2004-09-08 :
 > 
 > >  But your test case only applies to P2P interfaces, when both ends
 > >  of two P2P interfaces share the same IP address.
 > 
 > No, this is not the case. Only the remote ends of the two interfaces
 > share the same IP address. I described that test case because using gif
 > interfaces makes it easier to reproduce, but I initially observed this
 > symptom with one bge and one Intel wireless (ndis) interface.
 > 
 That's what I meant (two remote ends of both interfaces).
 
 > >  I do not see how this could apply to broadcast interfaces.
 > 
 > As follows. Consider a machine with two Ethernet interfaces I1 and I2.
 > 
 > ifconfig I1 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
 > ifconfig I1 down
 > ifconfig I2 192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0
 > route add default 192.168.0.254
 > 
 > The default route will be set to 192.168.0.254 on I1, not on I2 as
 > expected.
 > 
 It's still a misconfiguration -- if you do not bring the I1 interface
 down, the "interface" route for I2 will not be installed, and the
 ifconfig(8) command will be aborted.  Anyway...
 
 I reproduced this with two ng_eiface(4) nodes.  There's still a useful
 option in the route(8) utility -- you can supply an explicit reference
 to the interface, like this:
 
 : route add default 192.168.0.254 -ifp I1
 
 This is also vaguely documented in the route(8) manpage, FWIW:
 
 : In a change or add command where the destination and gateway are not suf-
 : ficient to specify the route ..., the -ifp or -ifa modifiers may be used
 : to determine the interface or interface address.
 
 
 Cheers,
 -- 
 Ruslan Ermilov
 ru@FreeBSD.org
 FreeBSD committer



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200409081250.i88CoPBQ086191>