Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:05:05 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Freebsd0101@aol.com Cc: kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: Kris' World Message-ID: <20050115050505.GA84051@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <a3.6b1915e8.2f19bae1@aol.com> References: <a3.6b1915e8.2f19bae1@aol.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 07:16:33PM -0500, Freebsd0101@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 1/14/05 6:47:32 PM Eastern Standard Time,=20 > kris@obsecurity.org writes: > >> I know how linux, windows, openbsd and every other major open > >> source project works, and I know how FreeBSD > >> used to work. I don't know of any other "open source" project > >> that abandons its best version to spend 2 years working on=20 > >> a re-write. > >> > >Me either, including FreeBSD. > ----- > Ah, so if you are in complete and total denial of "reality", how > can you claim that other don't understand it? All > of the above has been proven, so why don't you think it=20 > applies to FreeBSD? Speak. I smirk at your "proven" claims. I point at you and laugh at your strident "proof" that FreeBSD 4.x doesn't support a particular chipset, in the face of reports that it does, in fact, support the chipset (earlier mails that you pretended not to see). Welcome back to my killfile (although I doubt you'll stay there long because of your desperate need to hear your own voice). Kris --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB6KSBWry0BWjoQKURAi/yAJ0Vq9Zv70iqcWmfqYSK4QvRYgsQ4QCg+6pI /0VEKiLmrz7OOIat3huU79A= =d4pr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050115050505.GA84051>