Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:15:54 +0100 From: Simon Barner <barner@gmx.de> To: Frode Nordahl <frode@nordahl.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE status Message-ID: <20050210101554.GD16892@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> In-Reply-To: <a823b8bea2796c3403095613740a536d@nordahl.net> References: <Pine.BSO.4.56.0502081306440.28295@ux11.ltcm.net> <a823b8bea2796c3403095613740a536d@nordahl.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--F8dlzb82+Fcn6AgP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Frode Nordahl wrote: > I was surprised by the actual difference in system performance and=20 > usability between 4BSD and ULE under such loads! >=20 > If you haven't tried it on your heavy trafic server yet, go and do it=20 > right now! :-) Just a short "me too". In my case it isn't a heavy traffic server but a (slow) UP desktop system which "feels" substantially smoother with ULE. Simon --F8dlzb82+Fcn6AgP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCCzRaCkn+/eutqCoRApa8AJ0Wd5pdNv7anhfoTyBa/CJkxbXSgwCg2zlU N9dGHTKmk7aEUsl8j1yVMAY= =sXol -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --F8dlzb82+Fcn6AgP--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050210101554.GD16892>