Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:33:49 +0100 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please test: MPSAFE callouts Message-ID: <200502251734.08309.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <200502211852.01792.max@love2party.net> References: <200502211852.01792.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1981642.I2isSrg5ml Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 21 February 2005 18:51, Max Laier wrote: > All, > > Pyun reminded me that we are still useing Giant to protect our callouts. = We > don't have to since we protect our code in there with our own mutex and t= he > netstack is Giant-free as well now (provided that mpsafenet is enabled). > > If you have testing capabilities, please take the attached diffs for a ri= de > (on SMP hardware) with debug.mpsafenet=3D1 and MPSAFE NICs. It'd be grea= t if > we could enable it for 5.4R, but we need proper testing to do so! > > NOTE: If you use user/group rules you still need to set debug.mpsafenet= =3D0, > but testing of this scenario is welcome as well. > > Thanks in advance for your feedback! Has anyone even cared enough to compile this? C'mon it's not that hard and= we=20 really need some feedback! =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart1981642.I2isSrg5ml Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCH1OAXyyEoT62BG0RAq5GAJ0Y/tqTNGKDrfZ5N+XFjlic/BIn7wCbBkvX 8XBUtmKG+5CEdKqWwQgiiVY= =WFIh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1981642.I2isSrg5ml--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200502251734.08309.max>