Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 22:35:44 +0100 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Giant-free polling [PATCH] Message-ID: <20050311213544.GH9291@darkness.comp.waw.pl> In-Reply-To: <42320A3E.1020708@elischer.org> References: <20050311110234.GA87255@cell.sick.ru> <E1D9kbt-000FAj-00._pppp-mail-ru@f22.mail.ru> <20050311141450.GF9291@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <20050311142805.GB88801@cell.sick.ru> <42320A3E.1020708@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--/rPfFJkZbotMxBE6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 01:14:38PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: +> >P> There is still an unresolved problem (in your and our patch as well)= of +> >P> using ifnet structure fields without synchronization, as we don't ha= ve +> >P> access tointerface's internal mutex, which protects those fields. +> >=20 +> > +>=20 +> you need to add an interface method that has access to it.. I was thinking more about moving interface mutex into ifnet structure, but Robert has some objections IIRC. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --/rPfFJkZbotMxBE6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCMg8wForvXbEpPzQRAkh/AKCj0CedBDkj1J1iiJrMEFeg0aNgIQCeNUtP C7m3RyQzPgBy/WKLQCUaPho= =2mCX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/rPfFJkZbotMxBE6--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050311213544.GH9291>