Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 02:40:35 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.oberon.net> Subject: Re: HEADSUP: ports freeze delay Message-ID: <200503150240.43141.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20050314182412.GA29863@voodoo.oberon.net> References: <20050314182412.GA29863@voodoo.oberon.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1835734.KYYhoQY4A6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday, 14. March 2005 19:24, Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > Since portmgr decided to get new Xorg version 6.8.2 into ports > before the freeze, we need some more time to test it than expected. > > Ports freeze is now scheduled to begin on March 21, 2005 and will > last 10 days. Uhm. According to marcus@'s last HEADS UP (Death, taxes, and...ports freeze= ),=20 the ports-freeze was scheduled to begin on March 25th and take "at least tw= o=20 weeks". How exactly will a negative delay and shortening of period help Xor= g=20 getting tested? =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart1835734.KYYhoQY4A6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCNj0bXhc68WspdLARAmiZAJ9IVh9blw1LWpR9KFxRSvspxZfeOQCfZceb jRNWYxjljwJ27DvAObuPgpM= =NOA1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1835734.KYYhoQY4A6--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503150240.43141.michaelnottebrock>