Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 02:14:21 -0800 From: "Michael C. Shultz" <ringworm01@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mozilla port issues Message-ID: <200503160214.22289.ringworm01@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4237F34B.1000901@munat.com> References: <4237F34B.1000901@munat.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 12:50 am, Ben Munat wrote: > I've been working on upgrading 85 ports with portmanager -u for the > last couple days. Had to restart it a few times, but little by little > it seems to be whittling down the number of outstanding packages. > > Couple questions though... > > 1) a lot of the gnome stuff doesn't seem to be getting done... did I > read something recently about portmanager not being able to upgrade > gnome currently? Or some difficulty with gnome? > > 2) several of my remaining ports say that they're waiting on > mozilla-1.7.5_1,2 as a dependency, but if I try to upgrade that, it > stops, saying there are security issues with mozilla and I need to > update my ports tree. I've updated several times however... What else > do I need to do? > > 3) portmanager periodically says that it's missing > nautilus-media-0.8.1_1... any idea why that would be? nautilus-media-0.8.1_1 is no longer in ports, see the bottom of /usr/ports/MOVED. Eventually when the ports that used to depend on it are upgraded you will stop seeing that message, > > thnks, > > Ben > > PS: crap, I just remembered the UPDATING file... I see in there that > I can't use portupgrade to update gnome... does that mean it won't > work with portmanager either? Until the upgrade is done you should set DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES="YES" in your make file. portmanager will be able to do the upgrade, but when it can't upgrade one port like mozilla it won't upgrade anything that depends on mozilla either. -Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503160214.22289.ringworm01>