Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:35:56 +0000 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Danny <nocmonkey@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD-questions <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Portsnap necessary? CVSup insecure? Message-ID: <20050316233556.GM91771@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <addc34c605031615064b793c89@mail.gmail.com> References: <addc34c605031615064b793c89@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:06:07PM -0500, Danny wrote: > With regards to: http://www.daemonology.net/portsnap/ > > Should I be concerned about my servers that use CVSup? Do the FreeBSD > guru's refuse to use CVSup, or is this overkill? Depends on your threat model, i.e. what are you afraid of? If it's something that cvsup doesn't protect against, and portsnap does, then use the latter. Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050316233556.GM91771>