Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:49:05 -0500 From: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> Cc: Stephan Uphoff <ups@tree.com> Subject: Re: Freeing vnodes. Message-ID: <20050329044905.GA9730@VARK.MIT.EDU> In-Reply-To: <20050328231118.R54623@mail.chesapeake.net> References: <20050314213038.V20708@mail.chesapeake.net> <1110856553.29804.37784.camel@palm> <1110896909.29804.39143.camel@palm> <1111983665.64310.19.camel@palm> <20050328231118.R54623@mail.chesapeake.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > I am worried about the v_dd,v_ddid fields of a directory B that has the > > > to be released vnode A as parent. (Obviously in this case there is no > > > namecache entry with the vnode A as the directory (nc_dvp)) > > > > > > Right now A is type stable - but if A is released, access to B->v_dd > > > may cause a page fault. > > > > > > Stephan > > > > Jeff, > > > > Do you plan to address the problem now that the code is checked in? > > Vnodes with children in the name cache are held with vhold() and not > recycled. Yes, but cache_purge() is called directly in a number of places where the vnode may have children, e.g. in mount. So dangling references might still be possible unless cache_purge() fixes up the children's v_dd pointers appropriately.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050329044905.GA9730>