Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:56:48 +0200 From: Emanuel Strobl <Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: device sio vs. device uart Message-ID: <200506101356.50355@harrymail>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart4189483.FyMaJu3XGD Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Originally I posted this to questions@ but got no answer so I'd like to ask= =20 here: Hello, after compiling a custom kernel with device uart instead of device sio I=20 see the following in my boot message: sio0 failed to probe at port 0x3f8 irq 4 on isa0 sio1 failed to probe at port 0x2f8 irq 3 on isa0 sio2: not probed (disabled) sio3: not probed (disabled) But I don't have sio in my kernel at all. Can someone please explain me the major differences (besides the newbus=20 adaption) between sio and uart? And why is sio still in GENERIC? And of course why do I see these sio messages? Thanks in advance, =2DHarry --nextPart4189483.FyMaJu3XGD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCqYACBylq0S4AzzwRAp5yAKCLQ0vB6X+00CMDosIBm7ITDnOahgCfQ16n be4M3haejRBemXSy7QyqFCk= =0l1W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4189483.FyMaJu3XGD--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200506101356.50355>