Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 06:28:51 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: garys@FreeBSD.org Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man7 security.7 src/sbin/init init.8 Message-ID: <20050907.062851.132863475.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200509031716.j83HG0J6071877@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200509031716.j83HG0J6071877@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Wed_Sep__7_06_28_51_2005_732)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "Gary W. Swearingen" <garys@FreeBSD.org> wrote in <200509031716.j83HG0J6071877@repoman.freebsd.org>: ga> garys 2005-09-03 17:16:00 UTC ga> ga> FreeBSD src repository (doc committer) ga> ga> Modified files: ga> share/man/man7 security.7 ga> sbin/init init.8 ga> Log: ga> Moved descriptions of securelevels from init(7) to security(7). ga> ga> Files used both "securelevel" and either "secure level" or ga> "security level"; all are now "security level". Did we all agree with using "security level" instead of "secure level"? "secure level" is still used as a manual page alias (securelevel(8)), a sysctl MIB, and in other docs in doc/en_US.ISO8859-1, so I am afraid people will be confused. -- | Hiroki SATO ----Security_Multipart(Wed_Sep__7_06_28_51_2005_732)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDHgoTTyzT2CeTzy0RAsu7AKCiWbRsrEju6O3/pj/h/lmdcnXo/ACfV7Px qzyhrw5KNdUXpJ2lbJmN/r4= =2UjB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Wed_Sep__7_06_28_51_2005_732)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050907.062851.132863475.hrs>