Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:21:11 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Dmytro Surovtsev <sd@buc.com.ua> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.0 GENERIC Kernel perfomance Message-ID: <20051122212111.GA72725@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <4383561C.30900@buc.com.ua> References: <4383561C.30900@buc.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 05:32:12PM +0000, Dmytro Surovtsev wrote: > Hello, >=20 > Maybe it's my own opinion but I've discovered that 6.0 kernel is much=20 > slower than 5.4, I mean GENERIC in both cases. It's only your own opinion until you share with us the measurements that led you to conclude this. FreeBSD 6.0 is much faster than FreeBSD 5.4 in my measurements, especially in the area of filesystem performance. > And, as well, 6.0 works=20 > right with the set of ports come with it in distribution inly. Nearly=20 > any new port can not assemble with differnent errors, mostly like: "The= =20 > version of library XXX is installed, it's conflict with XXX-1, please do= =20 > pkg_delete, and pkg_add then". But after than nearly nothing works. This is not a FreeBSD 6.0 problem, it indicates that you aren't upgrading your ports properly. Look into the portupgrade tool, and if you have specific problems with using it, then post specific questions. Kris --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDg4vHWry0BWjoQKURAo9AAKCo4mlisCGDzW0V+xwmRDJZ44TlzgCgw/Nf A0JhHRCv+PwvBduFByVo2Bo= =Al8M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051122212111.GA72725>