Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 13:45:08 +0100 From: Tobias Roth <roth@iam.unibe.ch> To: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade confused about editors/emacs Message-ID: <20060106124508.GB14967@droopy.unibe.ch> In-Reply-To: <43BE63E7.4060209@rogers.com> References: <834B3A07-EC76-4645-8E1B-7ABEA4EC999A@submonkey.net> <43BE57E9.9060507@rogers.com> <43BE61C9.9060502@ebs.gr> <43BE63E7.4060209@rogers.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 07:34:47AM -0500, Mike Jakubik wrote: > > Its not harsh, its reality. If you are going to contribute, don't > contribute broken code. If its broken, fix it. If you cant fix it, back > it out until its ready. I have been using freebsd since 2.x and i can > tell you that the quality of freebsd is slowly declining, more and more > broken code is being committed, and its not being address properly. A > perfect example of this is the recent RCng commits to 6-STABLE. The > ports are clearly not ready for this, yet its been committed and left. > Now many ports refuse to work. This clearly breaks POLA. I agree to the RCng example. How long was it in -CURRENT? Two weeks? Then MFC it over the christmas season, when there is a high probability that maintainers of affected ports might not be around to fix the mess? Not good. greets, t.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060106124508.GB14967>