Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:22:57 -0500 From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> To: questions@freebsd.org Cc: sendmail@sendmail.org Subject: virtusertable blocking seems to have no effect Message-ID: <200603281422.57389.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! I host a domain with a handful of "real" addresses. I noticed, that spammers are using a variety of random-generated names @mydomain and wish to block such addresses with "No spam" responses instead of "User unknown". Here is (almost) what I have in the virtusertable: stol@example.com foo hq@example.com bar @example.com error:5.7.0:550 No spam, thanks I can see the "No spam,thanks" messages logged in the maillog (without the space after coma, for some reason), but there is no reject=550 message logged (which interferes with my other software) and some of these messages seem to pass through (although others are intercepted by other anti-spam defenses). For example, here are the only two log entries, that a spam message generates: Mar 28 13:45:58 corbulon sendmail[40026]: k2SIjvvb040026: <xgfytxswpcpc@blackalpinist.com>... No spam,thanks Mar 28 13:45:58 corbulon sendmail[40026]: k2SIjvvb040026: from=<example@example.net>, size=3305, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=example.example.net [xx.x.xx.xxx] Despite the "No spam,thanks" the message was accepted. What am I doing wrong? Thanks! -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200603281422.57389.mi%2Bmx>