Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 20:22:21 -0300 From: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> To: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: possible ifconfig / wi bug? Message-ID: <200606012022.21567.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <447F114A.2010306@errno.com> References: <200606010641.52222.joao@matik.com.br> <447F114A.2010306@errno.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 01 June 2006 13:09, Sam Leffler wrote: > If I recall correctly the wi driver leaves rate control decisions to the > firmware and has no way of knowing what the current tx rate is for each > client. > ok, understood since the prism cards I use are working fine this is no problem at all could be better to display NA or something in order not getting confused btw seems "wicontrol -l" does not show any stations anymore and replies=20 0 stations=20 and -L returns Available APs: wicontrol: SIOCSWAVELAN: Operation not permitted Jo=E3o > There have been patches floating around for a while to do tx rate > control in the driver instead (in which case this info would be > available) but they were never committed because of reported bugs. It > might be time to just commit the code anyway (to HEAD) in order to force > the bug(s) to be resolved. > A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200606012022.21567.joao>