Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:57:27 +0200 From: Phil Regnauld <regnauld@catpipe.net> To: eculp@bafirst.com Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS Message-ID: <20060829075727.GD20989@catpipe.net> In-Reply-To: <20060828182947.p8ylw4x48oko00kg@mail.bafirst.com> References: <44EF6E18.6090905@elischer.org> <44F3429F.6050204@FreeBSD.org> <44F344FA.1000408@elischer.org> <20060828195339.GF37035@funkthat.com> <44F362C0.6080309@elischer.org> <44F37063.6010302@elischer.org> <20060828182947.p8ylw4x48oko00kg@mail.bafirst.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
eculp@bafirst.com (eculp) writes: > > I assume that you have seen the following: > > http://www.howtoforge.com/two_in_one_dns_bind9_views That is definitely the right way to do it imho. > I found it interesting although I haven't had time to give it a try > especially since I'm thinking about leaving bind9 for djbdns and > ldap2dns even though I've never been crazy about djbdns and family. djbdns is ok as long as you don't plan on using IPv6, EDNS0 or DNSSEC. Phil
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060829075727.GD20989>